{"product_id":"nato-gender-and-the-military-critical-of-natos-gender-politics","title":"NATO, Gender and the Military - Critical of NATO's Gender Politics","description":"\u003cp\u003eIn this review of NATO, Gender and the Military the authors offer a focused account of how NATO has engaged with gender issues over decades, and why that history matters for scholars, policy makers and gender advocates. The book draws on newly declassified NATO documents to trace organising by NATO women and gendermen and argues that NATO functions as an institution of international hegemonic masculinity; this review finds the book best for readers wanting documentary evidence and institutional analysis rather than a general primer on gender theory.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eKey Features\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePrimary evidence base:\u003c\/strong\u003e Uses newly declassified NATO documents to provide first-hand archival insight into NATO's internal discussions and actions on gender.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eInstitutional lens:\u003c\/strong\u003e Frames NATO as an institution of international hegemonic masculinity, helping readers understand how gender norms are reproduced across member states.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eOrganising stories:\u003c\/strong\u003e Highlights the efforts of NATO women and gendermen who organised within NATO, offering concrete examples of advocacy inside a resistant institution.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eHistorical depth:\u003c\/strong\u003e Presents a long-established engagement with gender issues, tracing continuities and tensions across decades rather than focusing only on recent policy shifts.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eCritical analysis:\u003c\/strong\u003e Examines the masculinist protection logic that shapes NATO policy, useful for critical scholars and students of security studies.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eInterdisciplinary relevance:\u003c\/strong\u003e Connects gender studies and international security, making it valuable for both social scientists and practitioners.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eWho It's For\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe book is best suited to academics, postgraduate students and policy analysts who want a documentary, institution-focused study of gender in security institutions; it is especially useful for those researching NATO, military sociology or the politics of gendered norms. Readers seeking concrete policy toolkits or how-to guidance for gender mainstreaming operations should look elsewhere, as the book prioritises archival evidence and critical interpretation over prescriptive manuals.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIt will also appeal to historians of international organisations and activists who want to understand internal organising in a major defence alliance. Casual readers or those new to gender theory without prior background in security studies may find the tone and depth challenging.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003ePros \u0026amp; Cons\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePros\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eProvides unique access to newly declassified NATO documents that strengthen its arguments with primary evidence.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOffers a clear institutional critique by identifying NATO as shaped by hegemonic masculinity, which sharpens understanding of systemic barriers.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDocuments organising efforts by NATO personnel, giving voice to internal advocates and historical agency.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBridges gender studies and security studies in a way that supports interdisciplinary research.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCons\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe book is analytic and documentary rather than prescriptive, so readers looking for practical implementation advice may be disappointed.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDense archival detail and specialist framing could be challenging for general audiences unfamiliar with NATO or gender theory.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eSpecifications\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003ctable\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTitle\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eNATO, Gender and the Military\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSeries\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eRoutledge Studies in Gender and Security\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAuthors \/ Editors\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eKatharine Wright, Matthew Hurley, Jesus Ignacio Gil Ruiz\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eEvidence base\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eNewly declassified NATO documents\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eThematic focus\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eInstitutional gender norms and hegemonic masculinity in NATO\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAudience\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAcademics, policy analysts, gender and security researchers\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eOur Verdict\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor readers who want a rigorous, document-driven account of how NATO has engaged with gender, this volume is a valuable contribution that combines archival evidence with clear institutional critique; it is good value for scholars and policy analysts seeking depth and primary-source insight, though practitioners wanting step-by-step implementation guidance should complement it with more practice-oriented texts.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003ch2\u003eFrequently Asked Questions\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDoes this book use primary source material?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eYes. The study draws on newly declassified NATO documents to build its account of internal debates and organising.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIs the book suitable for practitioners seeking gender mainstreaming guidance?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNot primarily; the emphasis is on archival evidence and critical analysis rather than prescriptive implementation tools.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWho are the editors or main authors?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe volume is associated with Katharine Wright, Matthew Hurley and Jesus Ignacio Gil Ruiz and is part of a Routledge series on gender and security.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Katharine Wright, Matthew Hurley, Jesus Ignacio Gil Ruiz","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48762300268763,"sku":"0367730030","price":50.39,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0724\/1043\/1707\/files\/91Xi_4k_jHL._SL1500.jpg?v=1778478357","url":"https:\/\/gearmusthave.com\/products\/nato-gender-and-the-military-critical-of-natos-gender-politics","provider":"GearMustHave","version":"1.0","type":"link"}