{"product_id":"paradoxes-a-study-in-form-and-predication-philosophical-analysis","title":"Paradoxes: A Study in Form and Predication - Philosophical Analysis","description":"\u003cp\u003eOur review of Paradoxes: A Study in Form and Predication finds it a careful, argumentative book for readers who want a rigorous examination of semantic paradoxes and their implications for metaphysics. James Cargile presents an original defense of a \u003cstrong\u003eplatonistic ontology\u003c\/strong\u003e and argues that paradoxes result from errors in describing propositions and properties rather than from accepting propositions or properties themselves, making this a valuable book for philosophers seeking a sustained theoretical treatment rather than a quick survey.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eKey Features\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eHistorical context:\u003c\/strong\u003e Traces the impact of ancient semantic paradoxes on Plato and shows how these puzzles shaped metaphysical debates, helping readers place modern issues in their intellectual lineage.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eContemporary relevance:\u003c\/strong\u003e Connects the classical paradoxes with the modern work of Russell and others, clarifying why these problems still matter for logic and epistemology today.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eOntological argument:\u003c\/strong\u003e Presents a sustained defence of platonism that challenges the view that paradoxes force us to abandon propositions and properties.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eConceptual analysis:\u003c\/strong\u003e Explains how mistakes in describing propositions and properties can generate paradoxes, offering a targeted philosophical diagnosis rather than a purely technical solution.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eInterdisciplinary reach:\u003c\/strong\u003e Engages with topics in logical form, reference and predication, making it useful for scholars working across metaphysics, logic and philosophy of language.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eWho It's For\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis book is best for advanced undergraduates, graduate students and professional philosophers who have some background in logic, metaphysics or philosophy of language and want a sustained, argumentative treatment of semantic paradoxes and their metaphysical implications. It is particularly useful for readers interested in defending a \u003cstrong\u003eplatonistic ontology\u003c\/strong\u003e and willing to engage with careful conceptual distinctions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReaders seeking an introductory primer or a textbook with exercises and elementary explanation should look elsewhere, since the style assumes familiarity with key figures such as Russell and basic issues in logical form and predication rather than offering beginner-level exposition.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003ePros \u0026amp; Cons\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePros\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCareful, original argumentation that defends platonism with philosophical precision.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUseful historical linkage between ancient paradoxes and modern logical debates, adding depth to the discussion.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEngages multiple core topics-reference, predication and logical form-so readers gain cross-cutting perspective.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCons\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe treatment is advanced and argumentative, so it may be dense for novices or casual readers.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eSpecifications\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003ctable\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTitle\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eParadoxes: A Study in form and predication\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSeries\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCambridge Studies in Philosophy\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAuthor\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eJames Cargile\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePrimary topics\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSemantic paradoxes, logical form, reference, predication\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePhilosophical stance\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eDefence of platonistic ontology\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eApproach\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eHistorical and conceptual analysis connecting ancient and modern debates\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eOur Verdict\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eParadoxes is a thoughtful, argumentative book that rewards readers who want a rigorous defence of platonism and a conceptual diagnosis of semantic paradoxes. It is good value for specialists and advanced students because it links historical sources with contemporary debates and refuses easy technical shortcuts, offering a coherent alternative for those reassessing the ontology of propositions and properties.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eFrequently Asked Questions\u003c\/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDoes this book defend platonism?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eYes. The author presents an unfashionable but sustained defence of a platonistic ontology and argues paradoxes arise from mistakes in description, not the ontology itself.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIs prior knowledge of Russell or Plato necessary?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome familiarity with Russell, Plato and basic issues in logic and metaphysics is helpful, as the book assumes background knowledge rather than providing elementary introductions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIs this suitable as a textbook?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eNot as a primary textbook for beginners; it is better suited for graduate seminars or readers seeking in-depth philosophical argument rather than introductory teaching material.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"James Cargile","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48249029099739,"sku":"0521109639","price":45.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0724\/1043\/1707\/files\/41ZyZR2gSML._SL1000.jpg?v=1770843478","url":"https:\/\/gearmusthave.com\/products\/paradoxes-a-study-in-form-and-predication-philosophical-analysis","provider":"GearMustHave","version":"1.0","type":"link"}