{"product_id":"politics-and-form-in-postmodern-poetry-critical-mutlu","title":"Politics and Form in Postmodern Poetry - Critical Mutlu","description":"\u003cp\u003eIn this review of Politics and Form in Postmodern Poetry the reviewer finds a focused, intellectually rigorous study best suited to scholars and serious readers of postwar verse. Mutlu Konuk Blasing challenges the neat pairing of form with politics, arguing that traditional or experimental techniques do not map cleanly onto conservative or oppositional stances. The bottom line: this book is worth buying for anyone who wants a careful, historically informed argument showing how meaning is produced rhetorically rather than inhering in form.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eKey Features\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePostwar focus:\u003c\/strong\u003e Concentrates on poetry after World War II to situate the four poets in their cultural moment and demonstrate changing literary pressures.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eClose readings:\u003c\/strong\u003e Provides detailed analysis of individual poems by O'Hara, Bishop, Ashbery, and Merrill to show how form and rhetoric interact.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eTheoretical stance:\u003c\/strong\u003e Uses a postmodern critical perspective to argue that meanings and values are not fixed by form but are rhetorically constructed.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eComparative approach:\u003c\/strong\u003e Juxtaposes four major poets to test the assumption that experimental form equals political opposition and traditional form equals conservatism.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eCultural role emphasis:\u003c\/strong\u003e Highlights how poetry participates in broader cultural debates by revealing rhetorical operations rather than embodying fixed political positions.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWho It's For\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis book is aimed at graduate students, literary critics, and readers with a strong interest in postmodernism and mid-20th-century American poetry; it rewards readers who can follow sustained theoretical argument and careful textual analysis. In particular, scholars researching O'Hara, Bishop, Ashbery, or Merrill will find the comparative framework and rhetorical focus useful.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCasual readers seeking a general history of postwar poetry or a quick introduction to these poets should look elsewhere, as the book assumes familiarity with close reading and critical theory rather than offering broad biographical surveys or simplified summaries.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003ePros \u0026amp; Cons\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePros\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArgues persuasively that form alone does not determine political meaning, which clarifies common misconceptions about postwar verse.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClose readings of four major poets offer concrete evidence and illuminate individual poems beyond abstract claims.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eComparative scope helps readers see patterns and differences across authors, strengthening the central thesis.\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCons\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eTheoretical density may feel heavy for readers without a background in literary criticism.\u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003ch2\u003eSpecifications\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003ctable\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eTitle\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePolitics and Form in Postmodern Poetry\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eAuthor\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eMutlu Konuk Blasing\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eSeries\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCambridge Studies in American Literature and Culture, Series Number 94\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePrimary poets discussed\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFrank O'Hara; Elizabeth Bishop; John Ashbery; James Merrill\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eCritical perspective\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePostmodern rhetorical analysis\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003ctr\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003eFocus period\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003ctd\u003ePost-World War II\u003c\/td\u003e\n\u003c\/tr\u003e\n\u003c\/table\u003e\u003ch2\u003eOur Verdict\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003ePolitics and Form in Postmodern Poetry is a valuable, argument-driven book for scholars and advanced students who want a nuanced account of how form and political meaning interact in postwar American poetry. Its careful readings and comparative design make it good value for readers seeking depth rather than a general overview.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFrequently Asked Questions\u003c\/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDoes this book discuss specific poems?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eYes, it contains close readings and detailed analyses of poems by O'Hara, Bishop, Ashbery, and Merrill.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIs prior knowledge of literary theory required?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSome familiarity with literary criticism and postmodern theory will help, as the book emphasizes theoretical argument and close reading.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhich readers will benefit most?\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003cbr\u003eGraduate students, researchers, and serious readers of postwar American poetry will gain the most from the comparative and rhetorical approach.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Mutlu Konuk Blasing","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48778510467291,"sku":"0521106133","price":48.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0724\/1043\/1707\/files\/61XeZQxZKHL._SL1500.jpg?v=1778917977","url":"https:\/\/gearmusthave.com\/products\/politics-and-form-in-postmodern-poetry-critical-mutlu","provider":"GearMustHave","version":"1.0","type":"link"}