A Theory of the Tache in Nineteenth-Century Painting - Scholarly
A Theory of the Tache in Nineteenth-Century Painting - Scholarly
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of A Theory of the Tache in Nineteenth-Century Painting, the reviewer argues the book is essential for scholars and students of modernism who want a focused study of the painting blot as a recurring motif. ystein Sjastad places the tache at the center of nineteenth-century practice, tracing links between Manet, the Impressionists, and pointillist painters; the biggest reason to buy is the book's close readings that treat the tache as both a material trace and a cultural sign, offering a sustained argument not easily found elsewhere.
Key Features
- Focused thesis: The book treats the tache (blot, patch, stain) as a central motif that reveals continuities in nineteenth-century modernism.
- Close readings: Detailed examinations of Manet, Cezanne, Seurat and Signac illuminate how paint strokes operate as both material traces and visual signs.
- Comparative approach: By juxtaposing different artists, the author shows how variations of tacheism produced distinct cultural effects.
- Theoretical framing: The text argues that the tache functions as a meeting point between text and image, deepening interpretation of brushwork and surface.
- Scholarly contribution: Presented as the first sustained study of tacheism as a hidden continuum, it fills a gap in art historiography.
Who It's For
This book is best for graduate students, art historians, and museum professionals who need a concentrated study of nineteenth-century brushwork and the cultural role of surface. Its sustained argument and close readings make it suitable as a seminar text or reference in courses on modernism and painting technique.
Readers seeking a general survey of nineteenth-century art or an illustrated coffee-table history should look elsewhere, as the book emphasizes interpretive analysis over broad overviews or lavish reproductions.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Provides a unique, sustained argument about the tache as a recurring motif across several major artists.
- Offers rigorous close readings that clarify how brushstrokes act as both trace and sign.
- Bridges material practice and cultural interpretation, useful for scholarly research.
Cons
- Not intended as a general introduction; its specialist focus may be dense for casual readers.
Specifications
| Title | A Theory of the Tache in Nineteenth-Century Painting (Studies in Art Historiography) |
| Author / Brand | ystein Sjastad |
| Primary subject | The tache in nineteenth-century modernist painting |
| Artists discussed | Manet, Impressionists, Cezanne, Seurat, Signac |
| Approach | Close readings and theoretical framing of brushwork as sign and trace |
| Series | Studies in Art Historiography |
Our Verdict
For those studying modernist technique and visual theory, this book is a valuable, focused contribution that reconceptualizes brushwork as cultural practice. Its close readings and sustained thesis make it good value for specialists seeking depth rather than broad survey material.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book cover many artists?
Yes; it focuses on Manet, Impressionists, Cezanne, Seurat and Signac to illustrate variations of tacheism.
Is it suitable for beginners?
It is written for readers with some background in art history; casual readers may find the analysis dense.
What is the book's main argument?
The author argues the tache functions as a central motif and meeting point between text and image, serving as a trace of the artist's body and a cultural sign.
Editor's Take
A focused, valuable contribution for scholars of modernism that reconceptualizes brushwork as a cultural practice; best for specialists seeking depth rather than general surveys.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.