Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal
Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds, William S. Laufer offers a clear, critical examination of why corporate criminal law often fails to hold organizations accountable. The book is for readers who want a rigorous legal and policy analysis of corporate wrongdoing, and its single biggest reason to read is Laufer's persistent focus on how legal structures and corporate strategies combine to diffuse blame. This review highlights the book's analytical depth, its usefulness for law students and policy makers, and the ways it challenges assumptions about symbolic prosecutions and regulatory reforms.
Key Features
- Analytical focus: Laufer dissects recent legal reforms and shows why they leave gaps in attributing criminal responsibility to organizations.
- Case-driven argument: The book uses high-profile investigations and prosecutions as examples to illustrate how charges often fail to reach culpable decision makers.
- Policy critique: Laufer evaluates the effectiveness of regulatory and prosecutorial responses, helping readers understand limits of current strategies.
- Clear explanations: Complex legal doctrines and games corporations play are explained in accessible terms for non-specialists.
- Scholarly perspective: The work situates corporate criminal liability within broader debates about market legitimacy and investor confidence.
Who It's For
The book is best for law students, legal scholars, compliance officers, and policy makers who need a rigorous account of why corporate criminal liability often falls short and what that means for enforcement. Its focus on legal rules and organizational behavior makes it valuable as a seminar text or for those researching reform options.
Readers seeking a handbook of compliance tactics or a step-by-step guide to prosecuting corporations should look elsewhere; this is a critical, explanatory work rather than a practice manual or breezy populist treatment.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Thorough critique of legal reforms that clarifies why many prosecutions are symbolic rather than consequential.
- Uses concrete examples of high-profile investigations to illustrate abstract legal points.
- Accessible writing bridges scholarly analysis and practical concerns for regulators and students.
Cons
- The book focuses on systemic critique and offers limited prescriptive solutions for everyday compliance practice.
Specifications
| Title | Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds: The Failure of Corporate Criminal Liability |
| Author | William S. Laufer |
| Subject | Corporate criminal law and regulatory policy |
| Focus | Analysis of legal reforms, prosecutions, and organizational strategies |
| Use | Law students, scholars, policy makers, compliance professionals |
| Perspective | Critical evaluation of effectiveness of corporate criminal liability |
Our Verdict
Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds is a persuasive, well-argued study that explains why corporate criminal law often fails to pin responsibility on organizations and decision makers. Readers looking for thoughtful analysis of enforcement limits and policy implications will find strong value here, while practitioners seeking tactical compliance guidance may need a supplemental manual.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the book explain recent reforms to corporate criminal law?
The author reviews recent reforms and explains why they have not solved the core problem of attributing blame to organizations.
Is this book suitable for nonlawyers?
Yes; Laufer writes accessibly, though readers will benefit from some familiarity with basic legal concepts.
Does the book propose solutions?
It offers critical discussion and implications for policy, but it focuses more on diagnosing failures than on detailed prescriptive fixes.
Editor's Take
Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds is a persuasive analysis explaining why corporate criminal law often fails to hold organizations and decision makers accountable; ideal for law students, scholars, and policy makers seeking critical insight.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.