Do We Have Free Will? - Concise Debate on Libertarianism vs
Do We Have Free Will? - Concise Debate on Libertarianism vs
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Do We Have Free Will? readers get a compact, readable exchange between two skilled philosophers on one of philosophy's oldest questions. This little volume is best for curious students and general readers who want a clear, dialogued introduction to the dispute between libertarianism and compatibilism; the single biggest reason to buy is that the book presents both positions side by side, with each author defending a coherent view and responding to the other so readers can see the arguments in action.
Key Features
- Dual perspectives: Two clear, contrasting positions are presented so readers can compare libertarianism and compatibilism directly.
- Concise format: The compact volume makes a complex debate accessible without requiring prior technical knowledge.
- Interactive exchange: Each author presents a case and then engages in two rounds of back-and-forth, which clarifies rebuttals and counterpoints.
- Focus on responsibility: The discussion connects free will to blameworthiness and responsibility, showing practical implications.
- Accessible language: Tricky terminology and complicated concepts are simplified for new readers to follow.
Who It's For
This book is aimed at undergraduate students, interested lay readers, and anyone beginning a study of moral responsibility who wants a balanced, readable introduction. It serves well as a classroom supplement or a personal primer on how philosophers argue for and against freedom under determinism.
Readers seeking a comprehensive textbook, technical proofs, or exhaustive literature surveys should look elsewhere; this is a debate-sized volume that favors clarity and exchange over encyclopedic coverage.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Two-author format gives a fair presentation of both major positions in the free will debate.
- Short, focused chapters make the central issues accessible to non-specialists.
- Direct engagement between authors helps readers follow objections and replies.
Cons
- The concise format limits depth, so readers wanting exhaustive technical treatment will need additional sources.
Specifications
| Title | Do We Have Free Will? (Little Debates about Big Questions) |
| Authors | Robert Kane, Carolina Sartorio, Saul Smilansky |
| Debate positions | Libertarianism and Compatibilism |
| Format | Concise, debate-style volume |
| Focus topics | Free will, determinism, blameworthiness, responsibility |
| Intended audience | Students and general readers new to the debate |
Our Verdict
Do We Have Free Will? is a strong value for readers who want a clear, side-by-side presentation of libertarian and compatibilist arguments without wading into technical literature. It is particularly useful as an introductory classroom text or personal primer, because the authors' exchange illuminates both positions and the practical questions about responsibility they raise.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the book take a single side?
Both Robert Kane and Carolina Sartorio present and defend opposing positions, then respond to each other so readers can evaluate both sides.
Is this book technical or accessible?
The volume is written to simplify tricky terminology and make the debate accessible to newcomers rather than serving as a technical treatise.
Will it cover moral responsibility?
Yes; the authors directly connect free will and determinism to questions of blameworthiness, coercion, control, and responsibility.
Editor's Take
Do We Have Free Will? offers a clear, side-by-side exchange of libertarian and compatibilist arguments, ideal for students and curious readers who want an accessible primer on responsibility and determinism.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.