Eco-Management Accounting: ECOMAC Research - Practical Policy Guide

In this review of Eco-Management Accounting: Based upon the ECOMAC research projects, the reviewer finds a focused, policy-oriented resource best suited to environmental managers and researchers seeking a framework that links environmental management with management accounting. The book delivers a clear rationale for integrating environmental and financial information and summarizes outcomes from the EU-funded ECOMAC project, making it a useful reference for practitioners who need an evidence-based approach rather than a how-to manual.

Key Features

• ECOMAC framework: Presents a structured approach for linking environmental management and management accounting that helps organizations trace environmental costs to managerial decisions.
• Policy relevance: Emphasizes connections to EU environmental and climate research priorities, which is valuable for readers interested in policy-driven accounting methods.
• Research-based findings: Draws on the ECOMAC research projects and associated companies to offer conclusions grounded in empirical work and practitioner engagement.
• Interdisciplinary team: Contributions from multiple authors and advisors give a range of perspectives useful to academics and environmental consultants.
• Indicator and reporting focus: Discusses eco-management accounting, reporting and indicators to assist organizations considering environmental performance measurement.

Who It's For

The book is aimed at environmental managers, policy makers, and researchers in the field of environmental accounting who need a concise survey of the ECOMAC project and its implications for linking environmental data to management accounting. It is especially relevant to those working on environmental reporting and indicator design within industry or public policy contexts.

It is less suitable for readers seeking step-by-step implementation guides, software tools, or extensive case studies with granular numeric examples. Practitioners needing practical worksheets or templates should look for hands-on manuals in addition to this research-driven report.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• Provides a coherent research-backed framework that clarifies how environmental and accounting systems can interact.
• High policy relevance tied to the EU Environment and Climate Research Programme, useful for alignment with regulatory or research agendas.
• Compiled by multiple authors and contributors, offering a variety of academic and practitioner viewpoints.

Cons

• Not a practical implementation manual; readers will need additional tools or templates to apply the framework directly.

Specifications

Title	Eco-Management Accounting: Based upon the ECOMAC research projects
Project	ECOMAC (Eco-management Accounting as a Tool of Environmental Management)
Funding	EU Environment and Climate Research Programme, Theme 4
Focus	Linking environmental management with management accounting
Audience	Policy makers, researchers, environmental managers
Authors / Contributors	Matteo Bartolomeo; M.D. Bennett; J.J. Bouma; Peter Heydkamp; Peter James; F.B. de Walle; T.J. Wolters

Our Verdict

Eco-Management Accounting is a valuable, research-driven reference for professionals and academics who need a policy-relevant framework linking environmental performance and management accounting. It offers clear conceptual guidance and credible project backing, though users seeking hands-on tools will need supplementary practical resources.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this book explain how ECOMAC was funded?
The review notes the project was funded under the EU Environment and Climate Research Programme, Theme 4, which shapes its policy focus.

Is this a practical workbook for accounting teams?
No, the book provides a research framework and discussion of indicators rather than step-by-step implementation templates or worksheets.

Who contributed to the report?
The report compiles work from several authors and contributors including Matteo Bartolomeo, M.D. Bennett, J.J. Bouma, Peter Heydkamp, Peter James, F.B. de Walle, and T.J. Wolters.