Geschichte der Physiologie (Lehrbuch der Physiologie) - Historical
Geschichte der Physiologie (Lehrbuch der Physiologie) - Historical
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Geschichte der Physiologie (Lehrbuch der Physiologie) the reviewer finds a concise, historically minded survey suited to readers seeking an overview of the field rather than exhaustive technical detail. The book aims to trace the major lines of development in physiology, emphasizing the intellectual pathways, successes and missteps that shaped the discipline. Readers who want a compact historical narrative will appreciate the focused perspective; those seeking comprehensive treatment of individual experiments or exhaustive citations may find the scope deliberately limited.
Key Features
- Historical overview: Presents the main lines of development in physiology to give readers a coherent sense of the fields evolution over time.
- Concise presentation: Covers broad themes on limited pages, making it possible to absorb the core narrative without wading through excessive detail.
- Authorial intent: Reflects choices by the authors to prioritize major developments and interpretive angles rather than catalog every experiment or figure.
- Contextual quotation: Opens with a cultural-historical framing to connect physiological advances to wider intellectual currents.
- Academic tone: Written in a scholarly voice that suits students, historians of science, and disciplined readers who value careful synthesis.
Who It's For
This edition is best for biology students, medical historians, and scientifically literate readers who want a guided tour through the key moments in the history of physiology. It works well as a supplementary course text or as preparatory reading before tackling more detailed monographs on specific topics.
It is less suitable for readers seeking exhaustive case studies, step-by-step experimental reconstructions, or a comprehensive bibliography for primary sources. Specialists requiring in-depth treatment of single problems should consult dedicated histories or original research articles instead.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Clear synthesis of major developments helps readers understand the fields broad trajectory.
- Concise format makes it accessible for class use or rapid study without overwhelming detail.
- Scholarly framing links physiological advances to cultural and intellectual contexts.
Cons
- Limited space means many individual problems and experiments are not treated in depth.
Specifications
| Title | Geschichte der Physiologie (Lehrbuch der Physiologie) |
| Language | German |
| Authors | Karl E. E. Rothschuh, Wilhelm Trendelenburg, Erich Schutz |
| Subject | History of physiology |
| Approach | Broad historical overview emphasizing major developments |
| Intended audience | Students and historians of science |
Our Verdict
Geschichte der Physiologie is a well-focused historical survey that offers strong value for readers who need a clear, interpretive outline of physiological development. For coursework or general orientation in the history of biological sciences it delivers compact, scholarly context; however, specialists seeking exhaustive technical detail should pair it with narrower studies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this book written in German?
Yes. The text and quotations are presented in German, suitable for readers proficient in the language.
Does the book provide detailed experimental procedures?
No. The work focuses on major historical lines and interpretive narrative rather than step-by-step experimental reconstructions.
Who authored this edition?
The volume is by Karl E. E. Rothschuh, Wilhelm Trendelenburg and Erich Schutz, who provide the scholarly framing and synthesis.
Editor's Take
Geschichte der Physiologie is a concise, scholarly survey that provides a clear historical outline of physiology for students and historians, though it lacks in-depth treatment of individual experiments.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.