Identifying Hyperactive Children - Classic Sociological Study
Identifying Hyperactive Children - Classic Sociological Study
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Identifying Hyperactive Children, Peter Conrad's revised edition is recommended for readers seeking a thoughtful sociological angle on ADHD rather than a clinical handbook. The bottom line: this expanded case study remains valuable because it traces how behaviors are medically labeled and updated with recent sociological research, making it a useful bridge between classic field work and contemporary debates. It is an accessible, empirically grounded text that helps explain why diagnostic categories change over time and what that means for families and professionals.
Key Features
- Revised edition: The new and expanded text places the original 1976 study in a modern context, helping readers see long-term trends in the medicalization of childhood behavior.
- Empirical case study: Conrad's focus on the process of identification gives a clear, evidence-based account of how hyperactivity came to be recognized and managed in schools and clinics.
- Sociological framing: The book provides accessible introductions to core concepts in medical sociology that illuminate non-medical influences on diagnosis and treatment.
- Updated commentary: Recent changes in understanding ADHD and summaries of newer sociological research are included to connect past findings with present debates.
- Author expertise: Written by a seasoned medical sociologist, the book draws on decades of work to contextualize findings for students and professionals.
Who It's For
This book is best for sociology students, researchers, clinicians interested in the social dimensions of diagnosis, and educators who want a historical and sociological perspective on ADHD identification. Its emphasis on process and context makes it particularly useful as a companion text in courses on medicalization, deviance, or the sociology of childhood.
Readers seeking a clinical treatment guide, detailed diagnostic criteria, or step-by-step therapeutic approaches should look elsewhere; the focus here is analytic and sociological rather than prescriptive or medical.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- The updated edition combines original fieldwork with recent scholarship to show continuity and change in how hyperactivity is identified.
- Conrad's clear writing turns sociological concepts into practical insights for non-specialists.
- Its case-study approach offers concrete examples of institutional and cultural factors affecting diagnosis, useful for classroom discussion.
Cons
- The book does not provide clinical protocols or medical treatment guidance, limiting its utility for practitioners seeking hands-on management strategies.
Specifications
| Title | Identifying Hyperactive Children |
| Series | Ashgate Classics in Sociology |
| Edition | New and expanded edition |
| Author | Peter Conrad |
| Focus | Empirical study of identification and medicalization of ADHD |
| Subject areas | Medical sociology, childhood, diagnosis |
Our Verdict
Identifying Hyperactive Children is a strong value for anyone who wants a historically grounded, sociological explanation of how ADHD was labeled and how that labeling evolves. It is particularly recommended for students, researchers, and educators who need a readable case study that links classic fieldwork to later research, though clinicians seeking treatment guidance should consult clinical manuals instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this edition include new material?
Yes. The revised edition sets the original study in context and reviews more recent sociological research on ADHD.
Is this a clinical guide to diagnosing ADHD?
No. The book analyzes the identification process sociologically and does not offer clinical diagnostic protocols.
Who is Peter Conrad?
Peter Conrad is a medical sociologist and professor with extensive publications on medicalization and related topics.
Editor's Take
A readable, research-based sociological study that links the original 1976 fieldwork to later research; ideal for students and researchers seeking context on how ADHD is identified, but not a clinical guide.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.