Medieval Chinese Society and the Local Community - Scholarly
Medieval Chinese Society and the Local Community - Scholarly
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Medieval Chinese Society and the Local Community the bottom line is clear: this is a focused scholarly work for readers who want a careful rethinking of medieval Chinese social structures. Tanigawa Michio applies the kyodotaia communitarian framework to question long-standing periodization and stagnation narratives, making the book most valuable for historians, graduate students, and informed general readers who appreciate dense, theory-driven analysis rather than a surface survey of events.
Key Features
- Communitarian framework: Tanigawa foregrounds kyodotaia to explain how ethical and social cohesion at the local level shaped societal continuity, offering a new lens on medieval Chinese social life.
- Historiographical critique: The book challenges postwar Japanese Marxist interpretations and reassesses the causes of perceived stagnation, prompting readers to reconsider conventional periodization.
- Coverage across eras: The study spans the Six Dynasties through the Sui and Tang eras, demonstrating continuity and change across those formative periods.
- Theoretical depth: The author blends social theory with primary-focused interpretation, useful for scholars exploring methodology as well as content.
- Focused argumentation: Rather than a broad textbook, the volume maintains a concentrated thesis about local communities that supports careful, evidence-based conclusions.
Who It's For
This book is aimed at historians of China, advanced undergraduates, graduate students, and readers interested in historiography and social theory. Anyone researching medieval Chinese society or comparative medievalities will find the kyodotaia argument and the critique of Marxist periodization particularly stimulating.
It is less suitable for casual readers seeking an introductory narrative history or for those wanting richly illustrated popular histories; the text is argument-driven and assumes some prior knowledge of Chinese historical periods and scholarly debates.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Offers a distinctive and well-argued communitarian interpretation that challenges standard narratives.
- Provides a sustained critique of dominant historiographical frameworks, useful for students learning scholarly debate.
- Careful coverage of the Six Dynasties, Sui, and Tang periods supports comparative readings across eras.
Cons
- The book's focus on theory and periodization makes it less accessible to readers without background in Chinese history or historiography.
Specifications
| Title | Medieval Chinese Society and the Local Community |
| Author | Tanigawa Michio |
| Contributor | Prof. Dr. Joshua A. Fogel |
| Periods Covered | Six Dynasties, Sui, Tang |
| Main Concepts | Kyodotaia communitarian framework; periodization; stagnation debate |
| Intended Audience | Historians, graduate students, advanced readers |
Our Verdict
Medieval Chinese Society and the Local Community is a valuable, argument-driven work for specialists and advanced students who want a rigorous reassessment of medieval Chinese social structures. Its communitarian thesis and historiographical critique make it a worthwhile purchase for research and graduate seminars, though casual readers may prefer a broader introductory text.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book cover political history as well as social life?
The emphasis is on social structures and local community ethics across the Six Dynasties to Tang, with political developments discussed where they illuminate social cohesion and periodization.
Is prior knowledge of Chinese history required?
Some familiarity with the major periods and basic terms is helpful, as the book engages directly with scholarly debates rather than offering a basic primer.
Who contributed to the edition?
Prof. Dr. Joshua A. Fogel is listed as a contributor alongside Tanigawa Michio, indicating scholarly input and context in this volume.
Editor's Take
A rigorous, argument-driven reassessment of medieval Chinese social structures that is best suited to historians and advanced students; its communitarian thesis offers valuable historiographical perspective.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.