Networking Argument - Edited Papers on Networked Argumentation

In this review of Networking Argument, the edited volume collects select papers from the 2017 Alta Argumentation Conference and serves readers seeking a scholarly, cross-regional look at how argument operates in networked contexts. The book's single biggest selling point is its focused examination of argument across both online and offline networks, drawing contributions from scholars in Europe, Asia, and North America to illuminate practical and theoretical responses to information-age changes. For readers interested in communication studies, rhetoric, and networked information flows, this collection offers concentrated insight and dialogue.

Key Features

• Conference selection: Presents curated essays from the 20th Biennial Alta Argumentation Conference, giving readers a coherent snapshot of that event's leading discussions.
• International contributors: Includes work by scholars from Europe, Asia, and North America, which broadens perspective on networked argument beyond a single regional lens.
• Online and offline focus: Examines arguments in online networks and offline networks, helping readers compare digital dynamics with historical and contemporary advocacy resources.
• Theoretical and practical balance: Mixes conceptual analysis with attention to practical responses to changes brought by the information age, useful for researchers and advanced students.
• Edited volume format: Offers edited structure and selection that highlight themes and debates that emerged at the 2017 conference, providing a concentrated thematic read.

Who It's For

This book is best for graduate students, researchers, and instructors in communication, rhetoric, and argumentation who want a curated set of essays exploring how argument functions in networked societies. It also suits practitioners interested in the intersections of public advocacy and digital networks who appreciate scholarly framing.

Those seeking a single-author textbook or an introductory primer on networking technology will want to look elsewhere, since the volume centers on scholarly essays and debate rather than technical how-to coverage or beginner-level overviews.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• Contributors from multiple continents provide diverse perspectives on networked argument.
• Careful selection from a major conference creates thematic coherence across essays.
• Balanced attention to both online and offline networks makes the volume relevant across contexts.

Cons

• The edited collection format means the book assumes some prior familiarity with argumentation studies, limiting accessibility for casual readers.

Specifications

Title	Networking Argument
Editor	Carol Winkler
Source	Selected works from the 20th Biennial Alta Argumentation Conference (2017)
Scope	Essays on argument in online and offline networks
Contributors	Scholars from Europe, Asia, and North America
Organizational focus	Theory and practical responses to information-age changes

Our Verdict

Networking Argument is a thoughtful edited volume that will reward readers who want concentrated scholarly discussion of how argument functions across networks. It is good value for those in communication and argumentation fields because of its international contributors and balanced focus on online and offline dynamics, though casual readers seeking introductory material may find it demanding.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this book focus on digital networks only?
Answer. No, the volume addresses both online networks and offline networks, comparing historical and contemporary resources for argument.

Who edited the collection?
Answer. The volume is edited by Carol Winkler and collects selected conference essays from 2017.

Is this suitable for beginners in argumentation?
Answer. It is most useful for graduate students and researchers; readers without prior exposure to argumentation studies may find some essays challenging.