Philosophical Tales: Being an Alternative History Revealing
Philosophical Tales: Being an Alternative History Revealing
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Philosophical Tales, the reviewer finds a readable, provocative collection that will appeal to readers who enjoy intellectual history and clear, skeptical writing. Martin Cohen and Raul Gonzalez III present short, vivid accounts that unsettle standard hero-worship of famous thinkers and surface curious biographical and conceptual details. The bottom line: this book is best for the inquisitive reader who wants a lively, contrarian tour through philosophy rather than a textbook treatment; it rewards those who appreciate concise storytelling and pointed critique.
Key Features
- Concise portraits: Each tale gives a compact, accessible account of a single philosopher that highlights surprising aspects of their life and thought.
- Wide historical sweep: The book ranges from Socrates to Derrida, letting readers sample contrasting eras and schools within one volume.
- Debunking perspective: The authors deliberately challenge established narratives, encouraging readers to rethink canonical reputations.
- Readable style: The prose aims to be engaging and direct, making complex ideas approachable for non-specialist readers.
- Scholarly curiosity: The tales draw on lesser-known scenes and anecdotes to illuminate how ideas emerged in context.
Who It's For
Philosophical Tales is best for general readers, students, and curious laypersons who enjoy history of ideas presented as narrative and critique rather than as dense academic exposition. It suits someone wanting introductions to many thinkers without wading through long treatises.
Those seeking a comprehensive academic textbook, detailed primary-source analysis, or rigorous philosophical argumentation should look elsewhere; this book prioritizes color, characterization, and revisionist perspective over exhaustive scholarly apparatus.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Engaging stories make difficult thinkers feel human and memorable.
- The alternative-history approach encourages critical thinking about received wisdom.
- Compact chapters allow readers to sample many philosophers in short sittings.
Cons
- Not a substitute for primary texts or detailed scholarly works, so depth can be limited for specialists.
Specifications
| Title | Philosophical Tales: Being an Alternative History Revealing the Characters, the Plots, and the Hidden Scenes That Make Up the True Story of Philosophy |
| Authors | Martin Cohen, Raul Gonzalez III |
| Scope | Profiles from Socrates to Derrida |
| Approach | Alternative history and debunking narratives |
| Intended audience | General readers and students interested in history of ideas |
| Style | Readable, anecdotal, critical |
Our Verdict
Philosophical Tales is a worthwhile pick for readers who want a lively, revisionist introduction to major philosophers and enjoy narrative, character-driven accounts. It delivers good value as a readable companion to deeper study, prompting fresh questions about familiar names while remaining accessible to non-experts.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book cover contemporary philosophers?
The book spans a long historical range and includes later figures such as Derrida, so some modern thinkers are discussed.
Is prior philosophical knowledge required?
No; the tales are written to be approachable and do not require advanced background in philosophy.
Will this replace primary texts?
No; it is best used as a provocative companion that highlights personalities and context rather than a substitute for original works.
Editor's Take
Philosophical Tales is a lively, revisionist companion to the history of philosophy that brings famous thinkers to life through readable, anecdotal portraits; it is ideal for curious readers seeking accessible intellectual history rather than exhaustive scholarship.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.