Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence - Scholarly
Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence - Scholarly
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence, the bottom line is clear: this book is for readers who want a rigorous, philosophical re-examination of core assumptions about artificial intelligence rather than a how-to technical manual. Vincent C. Muller surveys debates about whether cognition is reducible to computation and whether classical AI's ambitions remain coherent, offering a thoughtful platform for resetting the research agenda. The book's greatest strength is its sustained, conceptual analysis that forces scholars and advanced students to confront foundational questions about mind, machine and scientific method.
Key Features
- Foundational focus: The book reassesses the claim that cognition is computation, providing readers with clear arguments to rethink long-standing theoretical assumptions.
- Interdisciplinary scope: It situates AI within philosophy, cognitive science and ethics so readers can see how conceptual choices affect technical directions.
- Critical agenda-setting: The text proposes alternative paths for AI research, helping scholars consider embodied or other non-classical frameworks.
- Clarity of argument: Muller lays out positions and counterpositions in a way that supports classroom discussion and concentrated study.
- Targeted readership: The writing assumes familiarity with philosophical and cognitive-science vocabulary, which benefits advanced students and researchers.
Who It's For
This book is aimed at graduate students, researchers and educators in philosophy of mind, cognitive science and theoretical AI who need a careful, conceptual critique of classical positions and a platform to explore alternatives such as embodied cognition. It will also reward technically minded readers who are willing to engage with philosophical argument rather than empirical engineering details.
Readers seeking a practical programming guide, hands-on machine learning tutorials or step-by-step instructions for building AI systems should look elsewhere; the book is not a technical manual and contains little in the way of code, datasets or engineering best practices.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Thoughtful examination of whether cognition can be reduced to computation, which clarifies central conceptual debates.
- Interdisciplinary commentary links philosophy and cognitive science in ways useful for syllabus design or seminar discussion.
- Offers constructive alternatives and an agenda for reformulating how AI and cognitive science relate to one another.
Cons
- Not suitable for readers who want practical, technical guidance or hands-on AI methods due to its theoretical emphasis.
Specifications
| Title | Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence |
| Series | Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 5 |
| Author | Vincent C. Muller |
| Subject focus | Philosophy of AI, cognitive science, theory |
| Main themes | Computation thesis, embodied cognition, research agenda |
Our Verdict
For thoughtful readers who want to interrogate the basic assumptions that underpin much AI research, this book is strong value: it reframes the core questions and outlines realistic alternative directions. Academics and advanced students will find it especially useful, while practitioners focused on engineering applications may need a more technical companion.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book explain how to build AI systems?
Answer. No; the book is theoretical and philosophical, not a practical programming or engineering guide.
Is prior philosophical knowledge required?
Answer. Some background in philosophy of mind or cognitive science is helpful to follow the arguments comfortably.
Does the book propose alternatives to classical cognitive science?
Answer. Yes; it discusses rejecting classical accounts and explores alternatives such as embodied approaches and redefined agendas for AI research.
Editor's Take
A rigorous, philosophical re-examination of AI assumptions that reframes core questions and proposes alternative research directions; best for academics and advanced students.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.