Political Obligation: A Critical Introduction - Essential for Students
Political Obligation: A Critical Introduction - Essential for Students
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Political Obligation: A Critical Introduction, the bottom line is straightforward: this compact book is an excellent entry point for students and curious readers seeking a clear, philosophical framing of why citizens might owe duties to the state. Dudley Knowles offers a measured survey of classic and contemporary argument, and the book's greatest strength is its ability to map disagreements-making it ideal for those learning the subject rather than specialists expecting exhaustive scholarship.
Key Features
- Clear framing of the problem: Knowles sets the debate around citizens' duties and the state's claim to obedience in accessible terms, helping readers grasp the central conflict quickly.
- Wide historical range: The book draws on thinkers from Hobbes and Locke to Rawls and Dworkin, giving context to how views on obligation developed.
- Critical introduction style: The text balances exposition and critique, so readers get both summaries of positions and reasons to question them.
- Suitable for first-time readers: The author structures material as a starting point, making it useful for undergraduate courses or independent study.
- Philosophical breadth: By including Hume, Hegel, Raz and Simmons, the book exposes readers to multiple argumentative strategies about duty and legitimacy.
Who It's For
Political Obligation is best for undergraduate students, seminar participants and general readers who want a guided introduction to the philosophical problem of political duty and legitimacy. Its survey approach and critical tone help newcomers understand why the question of obedience remains contested.
Those seeking exhaustive technical argumentation or specialist monographs on a single theorist should look elsewhere; this book functions as a concise, interpretive guide rather than a specialist reference volume.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Concise explanations that make complex positions accessible to newcomers.
- Broad coverage of primary thinkers provides historical and conceptual perspective.
- Balanced critical approach encourages readers to evaluate arguments rather than accept summaries uncritically.
Cons
- Not a deep specialist text, so it may lack the detail expected by advanced researchers.
Specifications
| Title | Political Obligation: A Critical Introduction |
| Author | Dudley Knowles |
| Series | Routledge Contemporary Political Philosophy |
| Subject | Political philosophy; political obligation and legitimacy |
| Coverage | Discussion includes Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Hegel, Rawls, Simmons, Raz, Dworkin |
Our Verdict
For students and general readers who need a clear, critical map of the debate over why citizens might owe obedience, Dudley Knowles delivers strong value: the book clarifies competing theories and points readers toward further work without overwhelming them. It is a worthwhile, economical starting point for course use or independent study.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this book suitable for beginners?
Yes. Its critical introduction style is designed to orient readers new to political obligation and to explain core thinkers and arguments.
Does it cover contemporary theorists?
Yes. Alongside classical figures it discusses modern contributors such as Rawls, Simmons, Raz and Dworkin.
Is it a specialist research textbook?
No. It is an introductory, interpretive work rather than an exhaustive specialist monograph.
Editor's Take
Dudley Knowles provides a clear, critical introduction to the problem of political obligation that is ideal for students and general readers who need an accessible survey of key thinkers and arguments.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.