Screening Violence 1 - Film Violence History and Analysis
Screening Violence 1 - Film Violence History and Analysis
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
Our review of Screening Violence 1 positions it as a focused academic read for film students, critics, and serious fans curious about the role of graphic violence in modern cinema. The book traces how landmark releases in 1967 helped make explicit violence a defining element of contemporary film and asks whether that shift is artistic, exploitative, dangerous, or liberating. Readers seeking a concise historical and theoretical examination will find the analysis thoughtful and tightly argued, while those expecting a broad survey or casual, illustrated coffee-table book should look elsewhere.
Key Features
- Historical focus: The book places the rise of on-screen violence in a clear timeline, linking 1967 releases to later trends so readers can follow cause and effect.
- Theoretical analysis: It examines competing interpretations of violent imagery, helping readers weigh arguments about art versus exploitation.
- Film examples: Specific films are used as touchstones to show how cinematic violence evolved and affected audience expectations.
- Cultural context: The text situates film violence within broader social and industry shifts, clarifying why certain styles gained prominence.
- Compact scope: The volume is narrowly focused, which benefits readers who want a concentrated study rather than an encyclopedic compendium.
Who It's For
Screening Violence 1 is best for film scholars, graduate students, critics, and serious cinephiles who want a targeted examination of how graphic violence became central to modern film language. It works well as a seminar text or as background reading for essays on film history and media effects.
Casual readers or those seeking a richly illustrated reference or a wide-ranging history of cinema should look for more general film histories; this volume assumes interest in theory and historical argument rather than visual spectacle.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Clear historical linkage to pivotal 1967 films that shaped later cinematic violence.
- Balanced discussion of opposing views, treating violence as both potential art and potential exploitation.
- Useful for academic discussion and classroom use due to its focused theoretical approach.
Cons
- Its narrow scope means readers seeking broad coverage of film history or extensive illustrations may be disappointed.
Specifications
| Title | Screening Violence 1 |
| Author / Brand | Stephen Prince |
| Subject | History and effects of graphic violence on film |
| Focus era | Post-1967 cinema |
| Intended audience | Film students, critics, scholars |
| Category hint | Books; Movies; Theory |
Our Verdict
Screening Violence 1 is a worthwhile, compact study for readers who want a thoughtful, theory-driven account of how explicit violence shaped modern film. It delivers focused historical argument and balanced analysis, making it a good value for students and critics who need a concise reference on this topic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book cover specific films in detail?
Yes; it uses notable films from around 1967 onwards as examples to trace shifts in cinematic violence.
Is this suitable for undergraduate coursework?
Yes, it is well suited to seminars and courses that examine film history or media effects, though supplemental readings may be helpful.
Will I find many photographs or stills?
No, the volume emphasizes analysis and historical argument rather than being heavily illustrated.
Editor's Take
Screening Violence 1 is a concise, theory-driven study that traces how post-1967 films established graphic violence as a central cinematic element; recommended for film students and critics who need focused historical and theoretical analysis.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.