Software and Patents in Europe - Examines Article 52 and technical
Software and Patents in Europe - Examines Article 52 and technical
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Software and Patents in Europe, the author Philip Leith offers a focused legal analysis aimed at readers who need to understand why software patentability evolved under the European Patent Convention. The book is for patent practitioners, academic researchers and policy makers seeking a clear account of how the Article 52 exclusion was eroded and how the EPO's 'technical effect' fiction reshaped practice. Its single biggest strength is a careful tracing of legal reasoning and case law that explains why form of application, not substance, became decisive for protection.
Key Features
- Legal analysis: Detailed examination of the Article 52 computer program exclusion and how it changed in practice provides readers with a coherent narrative of the law's development.
- Case focus: Close attention to the Vicom decision and subsequent Boards of Appeal reasoning clarifies why the 'technical effect' concept became central to examination outcomes.
- Historical context: The text situates legal shifts within the wider move to digital technology, helping non-specialists see why the exclusion proved impractical.
- Critical perspective: The book explains opposition to software protection and explores the contested policy and doctrinal issues that follow from protecting business methods and software throughout Europe.
- Practical insight: For examiners and counsel, the discussion of how form versus substance affects protection offers useful guidance when preparing or arguing patent applications.
Who It's For
Patent attorneys, in-house counsel and academic researchers focused on intellectual property law will find the book most valuable because it addresses the doctrinal changes and reasoning used by the EPO Boards of Appeal. The close reading of Article 52 makes it a useful reference when preparing arguments about software-related inventions.
Practitioners seeking procedural templates or step-by-step drafting checklists should look elsewhere; this is a legal and doctrinal study rather than a practice manual. General readers without prior exposure to EPC concepts may find some chapters dense and should be prepared for detailed legal argumentation.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Clear, scholarly tracing of how the Article 52 exclusion effectively vanished under EPO case law.
- Insightful critique of the 'technical effect' fiction that illuminates why the form of application matters.
- Useful for policy debate and academic discussion of software and business method protection.
Cons
- Not a practical drafting guide; readers seeking templates or procedural checklists may be disappointed.
Specifications
| Title | Software and Patents in Europe |
| Series | Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law, Series Number 9 |
| Author | Philip Leith |
| Primary focus | Article 52 EPC and the computer program exclusion |
| Key case discussed | Vicom decision and Boards of Appeal reasoning |
| Audience | Patent practitioners, academics and policy makers |
Our Verdict
Software and Patents in Europe is a focused, well argued study that belongs on the shelf of anyone engaged with European patent doctrine for software. It is good value for readers who need to understand how the Article 52 exclusion was circumvented and why the EPO now emphasizes technical effect, though those seeking practical drafting tools should supplement it with practice-oriented materials.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book explain the Vicom decision?
Yes. It offers a close reading of Vicom and shows how the decision influenced later Boards of Appeal reasoning.
Is it suitable for non-lawyers?
It is written for readers with some familiarity with patent law; non-lawyers may find the doctrinal detail challenging.
Will it help with patent drafting?
It provides conceptual insight into examination issues but is not a drafting manual and should be paired with practical guides for application drafting.
Editor's Take
A focused, scholarly study explaining how the Article 52 exclusion was eroded and why the EPO's 'technical effect' approach changed software patentability; essential for practitioners and academics, not a drafting manual.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.