Technologies for Intuition: Cold War Circles and Telepathic Rays
Technologies for Intuition: Cold War Circles and Telepathic Rays
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of Technologies for Intuition: Cold War Circles and Telepathic Rays, the reviewer finds a rigorous, thoughtful historical ethnography best suited to readers curious about how communication was theorized and tested across Cold War divides. The book's single biggest strength is its focus on the practical, social processes of checking, opening, or blocking channels of contact, presented through detailed case studies from telepathy experiments to theatrical empathy drills, which makes it valuable to scholars and intellectually curious general readers alike.
Key Features
- Comparative ethnography: The book places American and Russian practices side by side so readers can see how similar anxieties and techniques emerged in different political contexts.
- Theory of phaticity: By developing the concept of phaticity, the author gives readers a usable framework for understanding how people evaluate and maintain channels of communication.
- Range of settings: Case studies span laboratories, theatrical training rooms, and cross-cultural encounters, illustrating how communicative practices were enacted in diverse sites.
- Focus on practice: Attention to rituals, experiments, and drills shows how intuition and contact were cultivated rather than treated as mysterious givens.
- Critical perspective: The narrative examines both promoters and skeptics of contact, which helps readers judge claims about telepathy and mediated influence more critically.
Who It's For
This book will appeal to readers in religious studies, media studies, anthropology, and the history of science who want a careful account of how people shape and judge channels of communication. Scholars working on Cold War cultural exchange or the sociology of knowledge will find the comparative material and the concept of phaticity especially useful.
It is less suited to readers seeking a how-to guide for psychic practice or a popular survey of paranormal anecdotes; the tone is analytical rather than promotional and expects readers to engage with historical and theoretical argumentation.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Clear comparative frame that illuminates similarities and differences between American and Russian communicative practices.
- The concept of phaticity offers a productive lens for analyzing contact and channel evaluation.
- Rich, on-the-ground descriptions of experiments and drills bring abstract debates into concrete settings.
Cons
- Because the book is an academic ethnography, readers seeking light or sensational accounts of telepathy may find the style restrained.
Specifications
| Title | Technologies for Intuition: Cold War Circles and Telepathic Rays |
| Author | Alaina Lemon |
| Subject areas | Media, performance, intuition, Cold War comparative ethnography |
| Approach | Historical ethnography emphasizing practice and theory |
| Key concept | Phaticity (processes of making, checking, judging channels) |
| Settings covered | Telepathy experiments, theatrical empathy drills, cross-cultural encounters |
Our Verdict
Technologies for Intuition is a thoughtful, well-documented book that rewards readers who want a serious account of how communicative channels were imagined and worked in Cold War contexts. It is good value for scholars and curious general readers because it combines original ethnographic detail with a clear analytic frame that helps explain why claims about contact mattered politically and culturally.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the book compare American and Russian practices?
Yes, the author explicitly contrasts practices and debates in both countries to show convergences and differences in how channels of contact were managed.
Is this a how-to guide for psychic techniques?
No, the book treats telepathy and drills as cultural and historical practices to be analyzed rather than as instructions for achieving contact.
What is phaticity in this context?
Phaticity refers to the processes people use to make, check, and judge the strength or openness of communicative channels and contacts.
Editor's Take
A thoughtful historical ethnography that uses the concept of phaticity to explain how communicative channels were cultivated and judged across Cold War contexts; recommended for scholars and curious general readers.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.