The Independent Director in Society - Governance Rebalanced
The Independent Director in Society - Governance Rebalanced
Price subject to change. Tap below for current.
Couldn't load pickup availability
In this review of The Independent Director in Society the authors aim to diagnose and repair the widening gap between executives and those charged with oversight. Based on original research at Henley Business School, the book is best for governance professionals, board members, trustees and senior managers who want a practical evidence base for rebalancing oversight. The bottom line: this is a clear, research-backed examination of a society-wide governance crisis that explains why oversight fails and offers direction on how to catch and correct problems sooner.
Key Features
- Society-wide research: Draws on in-depth, original Henley Business School research to map governance challenges across business, education, health and charities.
- Focus on balance: Explains how the relationship between executives and independent directors becomes unbalanced and why rebalancing matters for accountability.
- Practical analysis: Offers concrete analysis that helps trustees and governors recognise weak oversight and take steps to improve detection and correction of problems.
- Cross-sector perspective: Moves beyond the corporate sphere to show common governance risks in universities, health services and sporting and charitable bodies.
- Accessible writing: Presents research findings in a way that is readable for practitioners rather than only academics.
Who It's For
The book is aimed at non-executive directors, trustees, governors and senior executives who must work together to improve organisational oversight; it will also be useful to students of corporate governance and leaders in public services who want a research-led account of systemic governance shortcomings. Practitioners seeking practical guidance on how to rebalance oversight relationships will find actionable insights.
This is less suitable for readers looking for a step-by-step legal compliance manual or a narrow corporate handbook focused solely on listed-company rules; the emphasis is on diagnosis, cross-sector patterns and rebalancing rather than granular legal checklists.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Well grounded in original Henley Business School research, giving the book credibility for governance professionals.
- Wide scope across sectors helps readers recognise systemic patterns rather than isolated incidents.
- Practical framing of how to rebalance oversight makes the book immediately useful to trustees and governors.
Cons
- Because it covers many sectors, readers seeking highly prescriptive legal or regulatory detail for one sector may need supplementary sources.
Specifications
| Title | The Independent Director in Society |
| Authors | Gerry Brown, Andrew Kakabadse, Filipe Morais |
| Research base | Henley Business School original research |
| Scope | Business, universities, health services, sporting and charitable institutions |
| Focus | Relationship between executives and independent directors/trustees |
| Use case | Governance diagnosis and rebalancing |
Our Verdict
The Independent Director in Society is a timely, evidence-based examination of governance failures across sectors that is especially valuable for non-executive directors, trustees and senior leaders who want to improve oversight. It offers strong research backing and practical analysis, making it good value for anyone charged with detecting and correcting organisational problems early.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this book include original research?
Yes. The authors base their analysis on in-depth, original research carried out at Henley Business School.
Is it only for corporate board members?
No. The book addresses governance across business, universities, health services and voluntary bodies, so it is relevant beyond listed companies.
Will it provide legal compliance checklists?
Not primarily; the emphasis is on diagnosis and rebalancing of oversight relationships rather than detailed legal or regulatory checklists.
Editor's Take
A research-backed, cross-sector examination of governance failures that helps non-executive directors and trustees rebalance oversight; valuable for practitioners seeking practical, evidence-based guidance.

Recently viewed
Recently viewed products will appear here as customers browse the store.