TRQ Rear Performance Brake Rotors Set Compatible with 2004-2013

In this review of the TRQ Rear Performance Brake Rotors Set the bottom line is simple: these rotors are aimed at owners who need a direct-fit, vehicle-specific replacement with an emphasis on improved braking feel and appearance. The reviewer found the set to be a straightforward OE replacement for compatible Cadillac XLR and Chevrolet Corvette models, offering a G-coated, cross drilled and slotted surface that combines corrosion resistance with enhanced ventilation. Installers will appreciate the pre-installed bearing races and the fact that the set ships as matching driver and passenger rear rotors for a balanced upgrade.

Key Features

• Direct Fit: The rotors are vehicle specific and designed to match OE fitment so installation is generally bolt-on with no machining required.
• Vented, Cross Drilled & Slotted: The vented and drilled/slotted design helps dissipate heat and resist brake fade under spirited driving.
• G-Coating: A premium G-coating provides added corrosion resistance to preserve appearance and extend rotor life in wet or salty conditions.
• Complete Rear Set: The kit includes both driver and passenger rear rotors so both sides are updated at once for consistent braking performance.
• OE Replacement Quality: Marketed as an OE replacement disc brake rotor set and referenced by multiple aftermarket numbers for correct match to listed models.

Who It's For

This rotor set is best for owners of 2004-2009 Cadillac XLR and 2005-2013 Chevrolet Corvette models that match the listed brake code and year combinations, who want a straightforward replacement that improves braking performance and looks without extensive modification. Enthusiasts who occasionally drive hard or want rotors that resist rust will also find the G-coating and drilled/slotted face beneficial.

Those who should look elsewhere include drivers with heavy duty brake packages or non-standard brake codes not listed in the fitment, and customers seeking a high-end track-only rotor engineered for racing; this set is intended as a premium aftermarket OE replacement rather than a pure race component.

Pros & Cons

Pros

• Quality fit and function that matches OE dimensions for a hassle-free replacement experience.
• Improved braking feel reported by users, with the drilled and slotted pattern aiding heat dissipation.
• Pre-installed bearing races and a full rear pair included save time during installation and ensure matched performance.
• G-coating improves corrosion resistance and visual appeal compared with plain rotors.

Cons

• Durability feedback is mixed among customers, so long-term wear rates may vary with driving style and environment.
• Compatibility is specific to certain brake codes and years, so buyers must verify fitment before purchase.

Specifications

Brand	TRQ
Fitment	2004-2009 Cadillac XLR, 2005-2013 Chevrolet Corvette (see listing brake code requirements)
Set Includes	Driver side and passenger side rear performance brake rotors
Design	Vented, cross drilled and slotted
Coating	Premium G-coating for corrosion resistance
Aftermarket Ref Numbers	56702, 56703, 580252

Our Verdict

The TRQ Rear Performance Brake Rotors Set is a sensible upgrade for owners seeking an OE-style replacement with improved cooling and corrosion resistance. It offers strong value for drivers who need a direct-fit rear rotor pair with pre-installed bearing races and who match the specified brake codes; check fitment carefully if you have non-standard brakes or heavy duty options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will these rotors fit my Corvette or XLR?
They fit the specific year and brake code combinations listed in the product description; verify your vehicle brake code and year before ordering.

Are these rotors ready to install out of the box?
Yes, the set includes driver and passenger rear rotors with pre-installed bearing races for simpler installation.

Are these suitable for track use?
They are a premium OE replacement with improved cooling features, but buyers seeking race-dedicated rotors should consider track-specific components instead.